Editorial Policy

We are committed to accurate, balanced, and transparent coverage of peptide research, regulation, supplier reviews, and practical guides.

Editorial Process

We publish staff-written and contributor-reviewed content using primary sources wherever possible, including journal articles, regulatory guidance, product disclosures, and company filings. Pages are updated when regulations shift, evidence changes, or material corrections are needed.

How We Evaluate Evidence

We aim to make research easier to interpret without overstating certainty. When helpful, we label evidence strength and distinguish between animal data, in-vitro work, observational studies, and randomized human trials.

Affiliate Relationships

Some pages include affiliate links. If a reader purchases through those links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost. Commercial relationships do not determine our factual claims, ratings, or editorial conclusions.

Vendor Selection and Reviews

Vendor and supplier coverage focuses on transparency signals such as testing claims, market reputation, shipping policies, disclosure practices, and product framing. Inclusion in the site does not equal endorsement.

Corrections Policy

If we publish inaccurate or outdated information, we correct it as quickly and transparently as possible. Material updates should be reflected in the visible page update date.

Masthead

PeptideUnicorn is produced by SUG Labs with named authors and reviewers displayed where applicable. Questions about editorial standards can be sent to editorial@peptideunicorn.com.